Apparently, more female candidates. According to A Woman’s Edge). Why? The argument runs like this: voters assume women are more trustworthy and in touch with everyday life. They are also viewed as the ultimate outsiders. In a 2009 study, Deborah Jordan Brooks explored this issue by sending out a fictitious newspaper article about a member of congress. Half the articles described Rep. Karen Bailey and half described Rep. Kevin Bailey. The two Baileys were judged equally competent and although were inexperienced politicians, “Karen” was viewed as stronger and more compassionate. Interesting…who now believe that women make desirable political candidates. (For more, see
Who is blogging?
- Academic medicine Academic publishing Biomedical Engineering Body language California Campaigns and Elections Clayman Institute for Gender Research Deborah Jordan Brooks doctorate recipients Elise Andrew Employment Family Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 female candidates FInancial Literacy Gender studies GIN@Stanford gin group Google Job Search Jo Handelsman Lean IN Leave of absence Massachusetts Institute of Technology McCormick Non-verbal communication Nonverbal communication Parent Parental leave Part-time Peer review politics Popular science Psychology research Research careers Risk aversion science Science careers Science communication Science in Society Scientific misconduct Social science Stanford Stanford Graduate School of Business Stanford University School of Medicine STEM fields Stress hormone Tissue engineering Twitter Unconsicous Bias United States United States Office of Research Integrity Vocal register Voice and Influence Women in science