Apparently, more female candidates. According to political consultants who now believe that women make desirable political candidates. (For more, see A Woman’s Edge). Why? The argument runs like this: voters assume women are more trustworthy and in touch with everyday life. They are also viewed as the ultimate outsiders. In a 2009 study, Deborah Jordan Brooks explored this issue by sending out a fictitious newspaper article about a member of congress. Half the articles described Rep. Karen Bailey and half described Rep. Kevin Bailey. The two Baileys were judged equally competent and although were inexperienced politicians, “Karen” was viewed as stronger and more compassionate. Interesting…
Who is blogging?
-
Join 13 other subscribers
- Academic medicine
- Academic publishing
- Biomedical Engineering
- Body language
- California
- Campaigns and Elections
- Clayman Institute for Gender Research
- Deborah Jordan Brooks
- doctorate recipients
- Elise Andrew
- Employment
- Family
- Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
- female candidates
- FInancial Literacy
- Gender studies
- GIN@Stanford
- gin group
- Job Search
- Jo Handelsman
- Lean IN
- Leave of absence
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- McCormick
- Non-verbal communication
- Nonverbal communication
- Parent
- Parental leave
- Part-time
- Peer review
- politics
- Popular science
- Psychology
- research
- Research careers
- Risk aversion
- science
- Science careers
- Science communication
- Science in Society
- Scientific misconduct
- Social science
- Stanford
- Stanford Graduate School of Business
- Stanford University School of Medicine
- STEM fields
- Stress hormone
- Tissue engineering
- Unconsicous Bias
- United States
- United States Office of Research Integrity
- Vocal register
- Voice and Influence
- Women in science
Archives
Meta