Over nearly two decades, the Office of Scientific Integrity has documented cases of scientific misconduct associated with NIH-funded research. 90% of these cases involve fraud. A recent study examined these cases in more detail to learn more about the people involved. Two interesting observations emerge. First, misconduct is distributed among career stages. Second, the proportion of male scientists committing misconduct exceeds their representation in the scientific workforce. Could this reflect gender differences in risk tolerance?
Who is blogging?
- Academic medicine Academic publishing Biomedical Engineering Body language California Campaigns and Elections Clayman Institute for Gender Research Deborah Jordan Brooks doctorate recipients Elise Andrew Employment Family Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 female candidates FInancial Literacy Gender studies GIN@Stanford gin group Google Job Search Jo Handelsman Lean IN Leave of absence Massachusetts Institute of Technology McCormick Non-verbal communication Nonverbal communication Parent Parental leave Part-time Peer review politics Popular science Psychology research Research careers Risk aversion science Science careers Science communication Science in Society Scientific misconduct Social science Stanford Stanford Graduate School of Business Stanford University School of Medicine STEM fields Stress hormone Tissue engineering Twitter Unconsicous Bias United States United States Office of Research Integrity Vocal register Voice and Influence Women in science